There are several elements that distinctly tell these
animations apart, also a few more subtle things. In this short essay we will
investigate both animations in a technical and psychological view. I will try
not to put a biased view on the analysis due to the lack of fondness I have for
one due to its underlying messages.
Firstly
lets introduce the animations themselves, The
Hand by Jiri Trnka from 1965, a very politically smelling animation that
describes a disconcerting protest against authoritative violence, human rights
and freedom. The plot is as follows: a puppet like humanoid is determined to
make a plan pot for his flower but is beset by the ever lingering Hand which is
much larger than him that makes him instead construct a monument towards it.
If we
analyse this animation it is a very political protest, as it was created in Czechoslovakia
who have suffered as a nation, the animation seems to be a submission of
rebellion, the way the characters act, especially the hand with its strong
presents and its aggressive controlling behaviour, show the struggle that the
country could have experienced. But what gives this away is towards the end, a
very powerful gesture that resembles that of Adolf Hitler, the arm extended
cast outright, which is a big give away that the animation is a plea for
awareness of the matters at hand.
This
brings me to the second animation in question, Dusan Vukotic and Zagreb Film,
Surogat (Ersatz), 1961. A brief summary of the plot is this: a very plump
looking man (bearing in mind this was animated using a very simple look using
block colour and basic textures) drives to the beach, and everything he brings
is inflatable, he pumps everything up to enjoy his time at the beach. Including
his companion, but after disapproving of her physical appearance he decides to
pump a different companion up.
Similarly
to the previous animation, it does hold a very strong social protest, this word
also being used to describe The Hand. this
protest is the uprising of sexism in culture across the country/ the world, if
we look at the animation, the main male character dislikes the look of his
companion so he blows a different one up, this is very controversial due to the
social aspect of that era, the tradition of being married by your parents has
started dissipating and the option of choosing your life partner more
predominant, it seems as though this animation encapsulates this but also
infers various stereotypes.
The
first stereotype is that of the newly blown up companion, this character is very
arrogant and goes for an equally arrogant character, a muscular male, rather
than the ‘less than muscular’ protagonist, this also brings us on to the issue
of appearance and how people judge eachother on their appearance and that when
you marry someone it is based on looks, this is not the case.
So both
animations have a very strong message that are very different but can be
related by its following of the time, and what is happening socialy and
politically, this is seen a lot in animation and these two animations are a
very good example.
No comments:
Post a Comment